
Xeon Gold 5117
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8256
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8256 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,286 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8256 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Platinum 8256
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,787 vs 16,897).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Xeon Platinum 8256
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8256 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,286 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8256 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,787 vs 16,897).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5117 better than Xeon Platinum 8256?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 409 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5117 and Xeon Platinum 8256

Xeon Gold 5117
Xeon Gold 5117
The Xeon Gold 5117 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,897 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8256
Xeon Platinum 8256
The Xeon Platinum 8256 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,787 points. Launch price was $7,007.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5117 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8256 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Gold 5117 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5117 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8256 — a 32.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8256 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5117 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8256 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5117 scores 16,897 against the Xeon Platinum 8256's 16,787 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5117. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5117 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8256.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+250% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB+17% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 14 MB+1300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 16,897 | 16,787 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5117) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8256). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5117 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5117 | Xeon Platinum 8256 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












