
EPYC 7662
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7662
2020Why buy it
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 73,387).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,424 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 7662
2020Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,424 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (72,298 vs 73,387).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6548Y+ better than EPYC 7662?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 513 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 935 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 724 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7662 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+

EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+327% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 72,298 | 73,387+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the EPYC 7662 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7662 launched at $6150 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($6150 vs $3726), the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is $2424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ the 50.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7662 | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6150 | $3726-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 19.7+67% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













