
EPYC 4585PX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.3% higher average FPS across 19 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,027 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 412.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 73,387).
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+4% higher PassMark.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 19 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.3% higher average FPS across 19 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,027 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 412.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+4% higher PassMark.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 73,387).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 19 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon Gold 6548Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4585PX and Xeon Gold 6548Y+

EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 32.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 3.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+39% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+72% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,563 | 73,387+4% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the EPYC 4585PX supports 7.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+8% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4585PX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($699 vs $3726), the EPYC 4585PX is $3027 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the EPYC 4585PX the 134.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-81% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+412% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













