
Xeon Gold 5420+
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($1,848 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.5 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($1,848 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 225W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,209 vs 58,534).
Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.3 vs 31.5 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,848 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($1,848 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.5 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($1,848 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 225W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,209 vs 58,534).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.3 vs 31.5 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,848 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6442Y better than Xeon Gold 5420+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 980 FPS | 998 FPS |
| high | 906 FPS | 940 FPS |
| ultra | 822 FPS | 853 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 847 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 753 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 685 FPS | 718 FPS |
| ultra | 615 FPS | 645 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 325 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 916 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 832 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 717 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 763 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5420+ and Xeon Gold 6442Y

Xeon Gold 5420+
Xeon Gold 5420+
The Xeon Gold 5420+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,209 points. Launch price was $1,848.

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Xeon Gold 6442Y
The Xeon Gold 6442Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,534 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5420+ packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5420+ has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5420+ versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5420+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5420+ scores 58,209 against the Xeon Gold 6442Y's 58,534 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6442Y. L3 cache: 52.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5420+ vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6442Y.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+17% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+2% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB | 60 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 58,209 | 58,534 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5420+) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6442Y).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5420+ rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon Gold 6442Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5420+ launched at $1848 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($1848 vs $2878), the Xeon Gold 5420+ is $1030 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5420+ delivers 31.5 pts/$ vs 20.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6442Y — making the Xeon Gold 5420+ the 43.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5420+ | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1848-36% | $2878 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5+55% | 20.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













