
EPYC 7401P
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6434
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7401P
2017Why buy it
- ✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 195W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6434 across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,836 vs 28,111).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6434 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6434
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌25.8% higher power demand at 195W vs 155W.
EPYC 7401P
2017Xeon Gold 6434
2023Why buy it
- ✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 195W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6434 across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,836 vs 28,111).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6434 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌25.8% higher power demand at 195W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6434 better than EPYC 7401P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 447 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 703 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 319 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 703 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 645 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 544 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7401P and Xeon Gold 6434

EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Xeon Gold 6434
Xeon Gold 6434
The Xeon Gold 6434 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 195 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,111 points. Launch price was $2,607.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6434 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6434 — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6434 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6434 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Xeon Gold 6434's 28,111 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6434. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6434.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+184% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,836 | 28,111 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,098 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6434 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 8 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7401P) / VT-x, VT-d, AMX (Xeon Gold 6434). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6434 targets Frequency-optimized Server Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6434 rivals EPYC 9174F.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Xeon Gold 6434 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, AMX |
| Target Use | — | Frequency-optimized Server Compute |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













