EPYC 7401P vs Xeon Gold 6434

AMD

EPYC 7401P

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6434

8 Cores16 Thrd195 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

  • +184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).
  • Draws 155W instead of 195W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6434 across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (27,836 vs 28,111).
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6434 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 6434

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 21 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 64 MB).
  • 25.8% higher power demand at 195W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6434 better than EPYC 7401P?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6434 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.1% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6434 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.1% more average FPS across 21 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6434 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6434 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 6434 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.1% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6434 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
1080p
low187 FPS189 FPS
medium165 FPS152 FPS
high132 FPS128 FPS
ultra105 FPS102 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS151 FPS
medium127 FPS117 FPS
high97 FPS95 FPS
ultra78 FPS74 FPS
4K
low71 FPS69 FPS
medium63 FPS57 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra39 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
1080p
low207 FPS522 FPS
medium188 FPS447 FPS
high160 FPS372 FPS
ultra131 FPS336 FPS
1440p
low178 FPS452 FPS
medium163 FPS399 FPS
high141 FPS340 FPS
ultra111 FPS295 FPS
4K
low112 FPS294 FPS
medium103 FPS261 FPS
high92 FPS239 FPS
ultra75 FPS214 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
1080p
low620 FPS703 FPS
medium518 FPS703 FPS
high466 FPS703 FPS
ultra399 FPS703 FPS
1440p
low517 FPS703 FPS
medium432 FPS703 FPS
high378 FPS703 FPS
ultra325 FPS643 FPS
4K
low383 FPS549 FPS
medium308 FPS451 FPS
high270 FPS391 FPS
ultra220 FPS319 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
1080p
low696 FPS703 FPS
medium696 FPS703 FPS
high651 FPS703 FPS
ultra561 FPS703 FPS
1440p
low667 FPS703 FPS
medium584 FPS703 FPS
high500 FPS645 FPS
ultra420 FPS544 FPS
4K
low475 FPS616 FPS
medium427 FPS539 FPS
high375 FPS474 FPS
ultra320 FPS398 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7401P and Xeon Gold 6434

AMD

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6434

The Xeon Gold 6434 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 195 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,111 points. Launch price was $2,607.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6434 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6434 — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6434 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6434 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Xeon Gold 6434's 28,111 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6434. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6434.

FeatureEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+200%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.1 GHz+37%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+184%
22.5 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,836
28,111
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,098
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6434 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
Socket
TR4
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7401P) / VT-x, VT-d, AMX (Xeon Gold 6434). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6434 targets Frequency-optimized Server Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6434 rivals EPYC 9174F.

FeatureEPYC 7401PXeon Gold 6434
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMX
Target Use
Frequency-optimized Server Compute