
Xeon E-2436
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6262
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2436
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA 3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,708 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 33 MB).
Xeon Gold 6262
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2436 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA 3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2436 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2436
2023Xeon Gold 6262
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA 3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,708 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 33 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2436 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA 3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2436 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2436 better than Xeon Gold 6262?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 335 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2436 and Xeon Gold 6262

Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436
The Xeon E-2436 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,708 points. Launch price was $331.

Xeon Gold 6262
Xeon Gold 6262
The Xeon Gold 6262 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA 3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,823 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2436 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2436 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2436 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon E-2436 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E-2436 scores 21,708 against the Xeon Gold 6262's 21,823 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2436 vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262.
| Feature | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+53% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 33 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 21,708 | 21,823 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2436 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262 uses LGA 3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2436 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA 3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













