Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6154

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

✅+44.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6154 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,457).

Xeon Gold 6154

2017

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅+44.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6154 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,457).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6154 better than Xeon Gold 6252?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6154 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6154 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6154 is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6154 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 6154 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6252 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 44.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Gold 6154 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6252 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6154	Xeon Gold 6252
1080p
low	181 FPS	195 FPS
medium	145 FPS	158 FPS
high	119 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	157 FPS
medium	115 FPS	123 FPS
high	93 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	72 FPS
medium	57 FPS	60 FPS
high	45 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	38 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6154 Open Xeon Gold 6252

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 6154	Xeon Gold 6252
1080p
low	398 FPS	233 FPS
medium	345 FPS	207 FPS
high	290 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	345 FPS	200 FPS
medium	306 FPS	180 FPS
high	258 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	214 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	223 FPS	125 FPS
medium	198 FPS	114 FPS
high	178 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	86 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6154 Open Xeon Gold 6252

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Gold 6154	Xeon Gold 6252
1080p
low	686 FPS	679 FPS
medium	686 FPS	679 FPS
high	686 FPS	679 FPS
ultra	686 FPS	657 FPS
1440p
low	686 FPS	679 FPS
medium	624 FPS	614 FPS
high	594 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	529 FPS	515 FPS
4K
low	465 FPS	459 FPS
medium	363 FPS	363 FPS
high	325 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	263 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6154 Open Xeon Gold 6252

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Gold 6154	Xeon Gold 6252
1080p
low	686 FPS	679 FPS
medium	686 FPS	679 FPS
high	678 FPS	679 FPS
ultra	590 FPS	609 FPS
1440p
low	686 FPS	679 FPS
medium	609 FPS	625 FPS
high	526 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	452 FPS	458 FPS
4K
low	481 FPS	514 FPS
medium	429 FPS	459 FPS
high	384 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	348 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 6154 Open Xeon Gold 6252

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6154 and Xeon Gold 6252

Xeon Gold 6154

The Xeon Gold 6154 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,457 points. Launch price was $3,543.

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6154 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6154 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6154 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6154 scores 27,457 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6154. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6154 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6154	Xeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads	18 / 36	24 / 48+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24.75 MB (total)	35.75 MB+44%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	27,457+1%	27,148