
Core i9-13900H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6252
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6252, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,444).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i9-13900H
2023Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6252, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,444).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900H better than Xeon Gold 6252?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 657 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 686 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Xeon Gold 6252

Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252
The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 24 / 48+71% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+24% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,444+1% | 27,148 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













