
Ryzen AI 7 350
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6242
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI 7 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,897 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 350 across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 7 350
2025Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,897 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 350 across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 350 better than Xeon Gold 6242?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 622 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 7 350 and Xeon Gold 6242


Ryzen AI 7 350
Ryzen AI 7 350
The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 7 350 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6242 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Krackan Point (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 24,897 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6242. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 22 MB+175% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1500% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,897 | 24,994 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












