
Core i9-11900K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6242
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,990 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900K across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Core i9-11900K
2021Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,990 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900K across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900K better than Xeon Gold 6242?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900K and Xeon Gold 6242

Core i9-11900K
Core i9-11900K
The Core i9-11900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,990 points. Launch price was $539.

Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11900K packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6242 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-11900K uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900K scores 24,990 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 6242. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900K vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+33% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,990 | 24,994 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













