
Core i7-13705H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6242
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13705H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 24,994).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
Core i7-13705H
2023Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 24,994).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13705H better than Xeon Gold 6242?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13705H and Xeon Gold 6242

Core i7-13705H
Core i7-13705H
The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6242 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6242. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB+700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,905 | 24,994 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13705H | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













