
Core i5-14400
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6242
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,994 vs 25,329).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-14400
2024Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,994 vs 25,329).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14400 better than Xeon Gold 6242?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 596 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 565 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14400 and Xeon Gold 6242

Core i5-14400
Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.

Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6242 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400 scores 25,329 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-14400. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 22 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1180% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 25,329+1% | 24,994 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













