
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6226R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6226R, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,278 vs 26,349).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-13800H
2023Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6226R, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,278 vs 26,349).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Xeon Gold 6226R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Xeon Gold 6226R

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.

Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R
The Xeon Gold 6226R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,278 points. Launch price was $1,300.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6226R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6226R has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6226R — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Xeon Gold 6226R's 26,278 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6226R.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+33% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB+700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,349 | 26,278 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













