
Xeon Gold 6140
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6140
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,187 vs 24,254).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6140 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6140
2017Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,187 vs 24,254).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6140 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon Gold 6140?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 583 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6140 and Xeon Gold 6222V

Xeon Gold 6140
Xeon Gold 6140
The Xeon Gold 6140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,187 points. Launch price was $2,445.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6140 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6222V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6140 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6140 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6140 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6140 scores 24,187 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6140 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 20 / 40+11% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+28% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB | 27.5 MB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 20 MB+11% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,187 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6140) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6222V). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6140 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6140 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












