
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 115W, a 107W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,177 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Extreme across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌1337.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z2 Extreme moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 115W, a 107W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,177 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Extreme across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌1337.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z2 Extreme moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Extreme better than Xeon Gold 6222V?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 401 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z2 Extreme and Xeon Gold 6222V


Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
The Ryzen Z2 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,177 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Z2 Extreme packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6222V has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme scores 24,177 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 27.5 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB+150% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,177 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











