
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,248 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HX moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,248 vs 24,254).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HX moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 6900HX better than Xeon Gold 6222V?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 591 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 6900HX and Xeon Gold 6222V


Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX
The Ryzen 9 6900HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,248 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 6900HX packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6222V has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HX versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 6900HX uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 24,248 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HX vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+36% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,248 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 6900HX uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











