
M3 Pro 12-Core
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M3 Pro 12-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,170 vs 24,254).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 12-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M3 Pro 12-Core moves to none and DDR5.
M3 Pro 12-Core
2023Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,170 vs 24,254).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6222V, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 12-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M3 Pro 12-Core moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than M3 Pro 12-Core?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Gold 6222V
M3 Pro 12-Core
M3 Pro 12-Core
The M3 Pro 12-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,170 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The M3 Pro 12-Core packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads β the Xeon Gold 6222V has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 12-Core versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V β a 12% clock advantage for the M3 Pro 12-Core (base: 2.748 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6222V is built on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Pro 12-Core scores 24,170 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 β a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.06 GHz+13% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.748 GHz+53% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | β | 20 MB |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | β | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 24,170 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
The M3 Pro 12-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M3 Pro 12-Core | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












