Xeon D-2752TER vs Xeon Gold 6137

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon D-2752TER

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 77W instead of 205W, a 128W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,074 vs 19,365).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌166.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 77W.

Xeon D-2752TER

2022

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 77W instead of 205W, a 128W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,074 vs 19,365).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌166.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 77W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6137 better than Xeon D-2752TER?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6137 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 20.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6137 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 20.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6137 is the better fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6137 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 6137 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 20.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2752TER is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-2752TER Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6137 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon D-2752TER	Xeon Gold 6137
1080p
low	173 FPS	186 FPS
medium	142 FPS	147 FPS
high	115 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	150 FPS
medium	114 FPS	116 FPS
high	89 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	69 FPS
medium	57 FPS	57 FPS
high	45 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	36 FPS

Open Xeon D-2752TER Open Xeon Gold 6137

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon D-2752TER	Xeon Gold 6137
1080p
low	205 FPS	460 FPS
medium	182 FPS	396 FPS
high	154 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	176 FPS	408 FPS
medium	161 FPS	358 FPS
high	138 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	267 FPS
medium	105 FPS	235 FPS
high	92 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	191 FPS

Open Xeon D-2752TER Open Xeon Gold 6137

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon D-2752TER	Xeon Gold 6137
1080p
low	477 FPS	484 FPS
medium	477 FPS	484 FPS
high	477 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	441 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	477 FPS	484 FPS
medium	477 FPS	484 FPS
high	414 FPS	459 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	397 FPS
4K
low	429 FPS	441 FPS
medium	333 FPS	350 FPS
high	285 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	248 FPS

Open Xeon D-2752TER Open Xeon Gold 6137

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon D-2752TER	Xeon Gold 6137
1080p
low	477 FPS	484 FPS
medium	477 FPS	484 FPS
high	477 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	477 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	477 FPS	484 FPS
medium	477 FPS	484 FPS
high	477 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	448 FPS	484 FPS
medium	400 FPS	457 FPS
high	356 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	305 FPS	354 FPS

Open Xeon D-2752TER Open Xeon Gold 6137

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-2752TER and Xeon Gold 6137

Xeon D-2752TER

The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2752TER packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6137 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon D-2752TER is built on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2752TER scores 19,074 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6137. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.

Feature	Xeon D-2752TER	Xeon Gold 6137
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.1 GHz+46%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+117%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	25 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	—
PassMark	19,074	19,365+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2752TER uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.