
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Xeon Gold 6137


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6137 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 37.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+29% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+28% | 25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | — |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 28,325+46% | 19,365 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6137). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon Gold 6137 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












