Core i5-1250P vs Xeon Gold 6137

Intel

Core i5-1250P

12 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

8 Cores16 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1250P

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Xeon Gold 6137 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,167 vs 19,365).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-1250P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6137 better than Core i5-1250P?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6137 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1250P is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6137 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6137 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6137 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 6137 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 21.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1250P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low169 FPS186 FPS
medium151 FPS147 FPS
high123 FPS120 FPS
ultra105 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS150 FPS
medium122 FPS116 FPS
high98 FPS93 FPS
ultra83 FPS74 FPS
4K
low80 FPS69 FPS
medium74 FPS57 FPS
high59 FPS45 FPS
ultra45 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low195 FPS460 FPS
medium166 FPS396 FPS
high153 FPS336 FPS
ultra137 FPS304 FPS
1440p
low172 FPS408 FPS
medium150 FPS358 FPS
high141 FPS305 FPS
ultra124 FPS267 FPS
4K
low139 FPS267 FPS
medium125 FPS235 FPS
high119 FPS215 FPS
ultra104 FPS191 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low479 FPS484 FPS
medium479 FPS484 FPS
high461 FPS484 FPS
ultra406 FPS484 FPS
1440p
low479 FPS484 FPS
medium465 FPS484 FPS
high415 FPS459 FPS
ultra367 FPS397 FPS
4K
low435 FPS441 FPS
medium356 FPS350 FPS
high315 FPS309 FPS
ultra257 FPS248 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low479 FPS484 FPS
medium479 FPS484 FPS
high479 FPS484 FPS
ultra479 FPS484 FPS
1440p
low479 FPS484 FPS
medium479 FPS484 FPS
high479 FPS484 FPS
ultra448 FPS484 FPS
4K
low470 FPS484 FPS
medium427 FPS457 FPS
high375 FPS409 FPS
ultra328 FPS354 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Xeon Gold 6137

Intel

Core i5-1250P

The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1250P (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-1250P is built on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6137. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1250P vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.

FeatureCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+7%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+129%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB+108%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-P (2022)
PassMark
19,167
19,365+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,250
Geekbench 6 Single
1,785
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,420
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6137). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Xeon Gold 6137 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-1250PXeon Gold 6137
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d