
Core i5-11600KF
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11600KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $237 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,468).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
Core i5-11600KF
2021Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $237 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,468).
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11600KF better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11600KF and Xeon Gold 6137

Core i5-11600KF
Core i5-11600KF
The Core i5-11600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600KF packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6137 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600KF versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600KF (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-11600KF is built on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-11600KF scores 19,468 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-11600KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600KF vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+20% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 19,468 | 19,365 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,277 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,138 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,631 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11600KF) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6137). Primary use case: Core i5-11600KF targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600KF rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11600KF | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













