
M2 Pro 10-Core
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro 10-Core across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,939).
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M2 Pro 10-Core moves to none and DDR5.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro 10-Core across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,939).
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M2 Pro 10-Core moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Pro 10-Core better than Xeon Gold 6130T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro 10-Core and Xeon Gold 6130T
M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core
The M2 Pro 10-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T
The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro 10-Core packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6130T offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon Gold 6130T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Pro 10-Core versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.42 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6130T is built on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro 10-Core scores 21,939 against the Xeon Gold 6130T's 21,804 β a 0.6% lead for the M2 Pro 10-Core. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro 10-Core vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz+15% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+125% | 16 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | β | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,804 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro 10-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













