M2 Pro
Popular choices:
Xeon Gold 6130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Xeon Gold 6130T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,939).
- ❌247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M2 Pro
2023Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Xeon Gold 6130T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,939).
- ❌247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while M2 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M2 Pro better than Xeon Gold 6130T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 81 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 225 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro and Xeon Gold 6130T
M2 Pro
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T
The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6130T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6130T (base: 2.42 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6130T is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Xeon Gold 6130T's 21,804 — a 0.6% lead for the M2 Pro. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz+15% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+125% | 16 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,804 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6130T). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Xeon Gold 6130T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Pro GPU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | ARM Virtualization | — |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on M2 Pro and Xeon Gold 6130T
