PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,510 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 404.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.3 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130H, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,230).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Core i7-13700

2023

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,510 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 404.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.3 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130H, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 36,230).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 94.3 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700 better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6130H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700 is the better fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700 is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700 is $1,510 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 404.2% better value on MSRP (94.3 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	264 FPS	182 FPS
medium	254 FPS	146 FPS
high	210 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	144 FPS
medium	193 FPS	114 FPS
high	153 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	67 FPS
medium	131 FPS	56 FPS
high	101 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-13700 Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	344 FPS	211 FPS
medium	293 FPS	186 FPS
high	247 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	182 FPS
medium	264 FPS	165 FPS
high	224 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	118 FPS
medium	160 FPS	107 FPS
high	152 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	81 FPS

Open Core i7-13700 Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	647 FPS	697 FPS
medium	530 FPS	559 FPS
high	467 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	558 FPS
medium	491 FPS	453 FPS
high	427 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	355 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	405 FPS
medium	373 FPS	315 FPS
high	338 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	225 FPS

Open Core i7-13700 Open Xeon Gold 6130H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	906 FPS	848 FPS
medium	851 FPS	771 FPS
high	735 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	799 FPS	684 FPS
medium	712 FPS	600 FPS
high	615 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	542 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	548 FPS	471 FPS
medium	497 FPS	423 FPS
high	444 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	327 FPS

Open Core i7-13700 Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700 and Xeon Gold 6130H

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon Gold 6130H's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+41%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	36,230+2%	35,440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the Xeon Gold 6130H supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6130H supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the Xeon Gold 6130H offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	LGA1700	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	2666+53220%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+26214300%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6130H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Core i7-13700	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700 launched at $384 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6130H debuted at $1894. On MSRP ($384 vs $1894), the Core i7-13700 is $1510 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the Core i7-13700 the 133.8% better value option.