
Xeon 6710E
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6710E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,400 vs 25,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+140.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $482 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6710E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon 6710E
2024Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+140.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $482 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,400 vs 25,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6710E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6710E better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 934 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 831 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 779 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 749 FPS |
| medium | 655 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 918 FPS | 935 FPS |
| medium | 830 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 620 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6710E and Xeon Gold 5520+

Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E
The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5520+ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Xeon Gold 5520+'s 61,227 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon 6710E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,225 vs 1,600, a 26.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5520+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,400 vs 25,000 (82.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5520+). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 64+129% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+83% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 61,404 | 61,227 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,225 | 1,600+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,400 | 25,000+140% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) — the Xeon 6710E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+).
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server, Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Efficiency Server | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6710E launched at $1565 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ debuted at $1083. On MSRP ($1565 vs $1083), the Xeon Gold 5520+ is $482 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5520+ — making the Xeon Gold 5520+ the 36.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6710E | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1565 | $1083-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.2 | 56.5+44% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













