PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 205W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6710E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (60,367 vs 61,404).

Xeon 6710E

2024

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 205W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6710E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (60,367 vs 61,404).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6710E better than Xeon Gold 5512U?

Yes. Xeon 6710E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6710E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 96 MB vs 53 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6710E is the better fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 82.9% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6710E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 5512U makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6710E is 27.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,565 MSRP versus $1,230 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 5512U is also 25.1% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 39.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6710E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 53 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 64 threads instead of 28/56. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon 6710E Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 5512U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	189 FPS	184 FPS
medium	152 FPS	162 FPS
high	121 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	153 FPS
medium	119 FPS	129 FPS
high	91 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	69 FPS
medium	59 FPS	62 FPS
high	46 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	39 FPS

Open Xeon 6710E Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	437 FPS	270 FPS
medium	378 FPS	241 FPS
high	306 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	241 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	359 FPS	227 FPS
medium	319 FPS	205 FPS
high	266 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	140 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	141 FPS
medium	201 FPS	130 FPS
high	168 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	98 FPS

Open Xeon 6710E Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	934 FPS	777 FPS
medium	831 FPS	691 FPS
high	779 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	693 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	672 FPS
medium	655 FPS	594 FPS
high	614 FPS	562 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	503 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	453 FPS
medium	378 FPS	370 FPS
high	334 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	279 FPS

Open Xeon 6710E Open Xeon Gold 5512U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	918 FPS	940 FPS
medium	830 FPS	841 FPS
high	715 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	622 FPS
1440p
low	710 FPS	762 FPS
medium	620 FPS	666 FPS
high	530 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	509 FPS	550 FPS
medium	455 FPS	493 FPS
high	400 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	344 FPS	372 FPS

Open Xeon 6710E Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6710E and Xeon Gold 5512U

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon 6710E. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Cores / Threads	64 / 64+129%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	96 MB (total)+83%	52.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (per module)+100%	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Sierra Forest (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	61,404+2%	60,367
Geekbench 6 Single	1,225	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the Xeon 6710E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+104857500%	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Gold 5512U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High Efficiency Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6710E launched at $1565 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5512U debuted at $1230. On MSRP ($1565 vs $1230), the Xeon Gold 5512U is $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 22.3% better value option.