
Xeon E5-4667 v4
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,477).
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,477).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5315Y better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Xeon Gold 5315Y

Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4
The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-4667 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5315Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5315Y (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4667 v4 scores 20,319 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 5315Y. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+125% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB+275% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,319 | 20,477 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-4667 v4 | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













