
Core i5-12500H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12500H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,462 vs 20,477).
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12500H
2022Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,462 vs 20,477).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500H better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12500H and Xeon Gold 5315Y

Core i5-12500H
Core i5-12500H
The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5315Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12500H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12500H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500H scores 20,462 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5315Y. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500H vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+25% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,462 | 20,477 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y). The Core i5-12500H includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop.
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













