
Xeon E5-2696 V3
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+104.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 22 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2696 V3 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,435).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2696 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+104.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 22 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2696 V3 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,435).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2696 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2696 V3 better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 390 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 390 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2696 V3 and Xeon Gold 5218T

Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
The Xeon E5-2696 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 21,435 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T
The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2696 V3 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 V3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2696 V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2696 V3 scores 21,435 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 V3. L3 cache: 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2696 V3 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+13% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB (total)+105% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 16 MB+6300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,435 | 21,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2696 V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2696 V3 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













