
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,148).
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,148).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than Xeon Gold 5218R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 495 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 287 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 563 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Xeon Gold 5218R


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218R offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X scores 25,148 against the Xeon Gold 5218R's 25,000 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 25,148 | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 2920X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218R). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5218R rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












