
Core i9-11900K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,990 vs 25,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218R, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-11900K
2021Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,990 vs 25,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218R, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900K better than Xeon Gold 5218R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 287 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900K and Xeon Gold 5218R

Core i9-11900K
Core i9-11900K
The Core i9-11900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,990 points. Launch price was $539.

Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11900K packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218R offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i9-11900K uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900K scores 24,990 against the Xeon Gold 5218R's 25,000 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218R. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900K vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+30% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,990 | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11900K) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218R). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5218R rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Xeon Gold 5218R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













