Core i7-13705H vs Xeon Gold 5218R

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 25,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218R, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 5218R

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Xeon Gold 5218R

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 25,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218R, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13705H better than Xeon Gold 5218R?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 5218R makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13705H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5218R is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13705H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i7-13705H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13705H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13705H Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 5218R Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13705H	Xeon Gold 5218R
1080p
low	262 FPS	186 FPS
medium	251 FPS	151 FPS
high	210 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	146 FPS
medium	191 FPS	115 FPS
high	153 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	68 FPS
medium	131 FPS	57 FPS
high	101 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-13705H Open Xeon Gold 5218R

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13705H	Xeon Gold 5218R
1080p
low	606 FPS	212 FPS
medium	515 FPS	188 FPS
high	436 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	399 FPS	136 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	183 FPS
medium	464 FPS	166 FPS
high	395 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	340 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	119 FPS
medium	276 FPS	109 FPS
high	263 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	230 FPS	82 FPS

Open Core i7-13705H Open Xeon Gold 5218R

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13705H	Xeon Gold 5218R
1080p
low	623 FPS	625 FPS
medium	527 FPS	625 FPS
high	467 FPS	625 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	625 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	625 FPS
medium	486 FPS	625 FPS
high	425 FPS	625 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	559 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	487 FPS
medium	372 FPS	399 FPS
high	333 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	285 FPS	287 FPS

Open Core i7-13705H Open Xeon Gold 5218R

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13705H	Xeon Gold 5218R
1080p
low	623 FPS	625 FPS
medium	623 FPS	625 FPS
high	623 FPS	625 FPS
ultra	623 FPS	567 FPS
1440p
low	623 FPS	625 FPS
medium	623 FPS	590 FPS
high	603 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	526 FPS	440 FPS
4K
low	549 FPS	468 FPS
medium	499 FPS	419 FPS
high	446 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	323 FPS

Open Core i7-13705H Open Xeon Gold 5218R

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13705H and Xeon Gold 5218R

Core i7-13705H

The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon Gold 5218R

The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218R offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Xeon Gold 5218R's 25,000 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218R. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Xeon Gold 5218R
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	20 / 40+43%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+25%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	27.5 MB+15%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	20 MB+900%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,905	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.