
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,544 vs 21,586).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,273 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,544 vs 21,586).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,273 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 395 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 143 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Xeon Gold 5218


Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,544 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 21,544 against the Xeon Gold 5218's 21,586 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1500% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,544 | 21,586 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












