Xeon D-1746TER vs Xeon Gold 5215

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon D-1746TER

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 67W instead of 85W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5215 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,660 vs 15,757).

Xeon Gold 5215

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌26.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 67W.

Xeon D-1746TER

2022

Xeon Gold 5215

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 67W instead of 85W, a 18W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5215 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,660 vs 15,757).

Trade-offs

❌26.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 67W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5215 better than Xeon D-1746TER?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5215 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5215 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5215 is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5215 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 5215 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1746TER is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-1746TER Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 5215 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon D-1746TER	Xeon Gold 5215
1080p
low	173 FPS	171 FPS
medium	141 FPS	136 FPS
high	114 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	140 FPS
medium	114 FPS	110 FPS
high	89 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	66 FPS
medium	57 FPS	55 FPS
high	45 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open Xeon D-1746TER Open Xeon Gold 5215

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon D-1746TER	Xeon Gold 5215
1080p
low	154 FPS	219 FPS
medium	135 FPS	191 FPS
high	120 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	135 FPS	196 FPS
medium	122 FPS	173 FPS
high	109 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	128 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	160 FPS
medium	91 FPS	145 FPS
high	81 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	96 FPS

Open Xeon D-1746TER Open Xeon Gold 5215

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon D-1746TER	Xeon Gold 5215
1080p
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	394 FPS
high	392 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	394 FPS
1440p
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	394 FPS
high	392 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	344 FPS	394 FPS
4K
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	327 FPS	365 FPS
high	278 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	262 FPS

Open Xeon D-1746TER Open Xeon Gold 5215

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon D-1746TER	Xeon Gold 5215
1080p
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	394 FPS
high	392 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	394 FPS
1440p
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	394 FPS
high	392 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	394 FPS
4K
low	392 FPS	394 FPS
medium	392 FPS	394 FPS
high	358 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	343 FPS

Open Xeon D-1746TER Open Xeon Gold 5215

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-1746TER and Xeon Gold 5215

Xeon D-1746TER

The Xeon D-1746TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,660 points. Launch price was $1,069.

Xeon Gold 5215

The Xeon Gold 5215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 15,757 points. Launch price was $1,221.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1746TER and Xeon Gold 5215 share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1746TER versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5215 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5215 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon D-1746TER uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1746TER scores 15,660 against the Xeon Gold 5215's 15,757 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5215. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1746TER vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5215.

Feature	Xeon D-1746TER	Xeon Gold 5215
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)+9%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	10 MB+700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	15,660	15,757

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1746TER uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.