PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,798 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 469.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 330W, a 210W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+129.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌175% higher power demand at 330W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,798 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 469.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 330W, a 210W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+129.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅214.3% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌175% higher power demand at 330W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon 6747P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the better fit. You are getting 129.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $5,798 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it gives you a 28.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6747P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 129.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 469.7% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	291 FPS	188 FPS
medium	265 FPS	165 FPS
high	219 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	155 FPS
medium	227 FPS	131 FPS
high	177 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	70 FPS
medium	156 FPS	63 FPS
high	120 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	734 FPS	520 FPS
medium	627 FPS	460 FPS
high	465 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	425 FPS
medium	536 FPS	383 FPS
high	413 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	262 FPS
medium	305 FPS	239 FPS
high	268 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	176 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	1025 FPS	849 FPS
medium	1122 FPS	768 FPS
high	1062 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	936 FPS	737 FPS
medium	845 FPS	662 FPS
high	775 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	493 FPS
medium	498 FPS	402 FPS
high	447 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	1082 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	973 FPS	916 FPS
high	854 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	853 FPS	848 FPS
medium	751 FPS	727 FPS
high	659 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	623 FPS	613 FPS
medium	555 FPS	538 FPS
high	493 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	403 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon 6747P

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 37.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 48% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 2,000, a 37.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 45,000 (78.5% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+46%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+56%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	62,323	101,685+63%
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,581	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,926+46%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,643	45,000+129%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
Socket	AM5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	88+214%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6747P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($699 vs $6497), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $5798 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 140.3% better value option.