EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6747P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6747P

48 Cores96 Thrd330 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9634

84 / 168

107,944

+6.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6747P

48 / 96

101,685

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

✅+88.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).
✅Draws 290W instead of 330W, a 40W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,807 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 85,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (288 MB vs 384 MB).

EPYC 9634

2022

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+88.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).
✅Draws 290W instead of 330W, a 40W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,807 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 85,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (288 MB vs 384 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6747P better than EPYC 9634?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon 6747P is ahead with a 22.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 pulls ahead with 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9634 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the better fit. You are getting 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 288 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6747P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6747P is $3,807 cheaper on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $10,304 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9634 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 49.4% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9634 Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	170 FPS	188 FPS
medium	141 FPS	165 FPS
high	122 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	155 FPS
medium	119 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	70 FPS
medium	59 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	280 FPS	520 FPS
medium	246 FPS	460 FPS
high	202 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	425 FPS
medium	207 FPS	383 FPS
high	175 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	262 FPS
medium	130 FPS	239 FPS
high	117 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	671 FPS	849 FPS
medium	560 FPS	768 FPS
high	522 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	454 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	737 FPS
medium	425 FPS	662 FPS
high	389 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	493 FPS
medium	293 FPS	402 FPS
high	262 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	899 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	819 FPS	916 FPS
high	706 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	621 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	722 FPS	848 FPS
medium	629 FPS	727 FPS
high	538 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	518 FPS	613 FPS
medium	462 FPS	538 FPS
high	406 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	403 FPS

Open EPYC 9634 Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9634 has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6747P (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 6% lead for the EPYC 9634. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 2,000, a 10.5% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 45,000 (61.5% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	84 / 168+75%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	2.7 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+33%	288 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	107,944+6%	101,685
Geekbench 6 Single	1,800	2,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	85,000+89%	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9634 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9634 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9634) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9634) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9634 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9634	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server/Datacenter	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9634 launched at $10304 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($10304 vs $6497), the Xeon 6747P is $3807 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 39.6% better value option.