Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6741P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $322 less on MSRP ($4,099 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
❌16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (100,660 vs 106,263).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $322 less on MSRP ($4,099 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
❌16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (100,660 vs 106,263).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX better than Xeon 6741P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 36.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 36.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is $322 cheaper on MSRP at $4,099 MSRP versus $4,421 MSRP, and it gives you a 36.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 13.9% better value on MSRP (25.9 vs 22.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Benchmark Check

Xeon 6741P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	314 FPS	187 FPS
medium	289 FPS	165 FPS
high	240 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	155 FPS
medium	231 FPS	131 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	70 FPS
medium	158 FPS	63 FPS
high	121 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Open Xeon 6741P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	818 FPS	520 FPS
medium	697 FPS	460 FPS
high	542 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	674 FPS	425 FPS
medium	599 FPS	383 FPS
high	480 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	262 FPS
medium	339 FPS	239 FPS
high	310 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	176 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Open Xeon 6741P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	891 FPS	849 FPS
medium	723 FPS	768 FPS
high	649 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	714 FPS	737 FPS
medium	580 FPS	662 FPS
high	508 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	508 FPS	493 FPS
medium	419 FPS	402 FPS
high	375 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Open Xeon 6741P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
1080p
low	1116 FPS	978 FPS
medium	1002 FPS	883 FPS
high	879 FPS	763 FPS
ultra	792 FPS	659 FPS
1440p
low	872 FPS	800 FPS
medium	768 FPS	698 FPS
high	674 FPS	601 FPS
ultra	587 FPS	514 FPS
4K
low	636 FPS	574 FPS
medium	568 FPS	516 FPS
high	504 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	395 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Open Xeon 6741P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX and Xeon 6741P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6741P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX scores 106,263 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 5.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 3,195, a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+60%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Shimada Peak (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	106,263+6%	100,660
Cinebench R23 Multi	83,982	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,200	3,195
Geekbench 6 Multi	31,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
Socket	sTR5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4 TB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6741P
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	High-end Workstation	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX launched at $4099 MSRP, while the Xeon 6741P debuted at $4421. On MSRP ($4099 vs $4421), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is $322 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX delivers 25.9 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX the 13% better value option.