EPYC 9534 vs Xeon 6740P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9534

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6740P

48 Cores96 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9534

64 / 128

89,077

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon 6740P

48 / 96

90,684

+1.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9534

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.6% higher average FPS across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (89,077 vs 90,684).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $4,153 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9534 across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9534

2022

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.6% higher average FPS across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $4,153 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (89,077 vs 90,684).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9534 across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6740P better than EPYC 9534?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9534 is ahead with a 32.6% average FPS lead across 12 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740P pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740P is the better fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6740P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6740P is $4,153 cheaper on MSRP at $4,650 MSRP versus $8,803 MSRP, and it gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 9534 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 32.6% average FPS lead across 12 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 92.7% better value on MSRP (19.5 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9534 Benchmark Check

Xeon 6740P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	170 FPS	187 FPS
medium	141 FPS	165 FPS
high	122 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	155 FPS
medium	119 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	70 FPS
medium	59 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Xeon 6740P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	524 FPS	285 FPS
medium	457 FPS	252 FPS
high	365 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	431 FPS	233 FPS
medium	385 FPS	210 FPS
high	317 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	265 FPS	144 FPS
medium	241 FPS	133 FPS
high	211 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Xeon 6740P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	671 FPS	849 FPS
medium	560 FPS	768 FPS
high	522 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	454 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	737 FPS
medium	425 FPS	662 FPS
high	389 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	493 FPS
medium	293 FPS	402 FPS
high	262 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Xeon 6740P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	902 FPS	1097 FPS
medium	822 FPS	978 FPS
high	708 FPS	834 FPS
ultra	623 FPS	702 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	902 FPS
medium	631 FPS	777 FPS
high	540 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	461 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	519 FPS	656 FPS
medium	464 FPS	577 FPS
high	407 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	425 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Xeon 6740P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6740P

EPYC 9534

The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9534 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6740P (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9534 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9534 scores 89,077 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

Feature	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz+17%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	89,077	90,684+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,650	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9534 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9534) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9534) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the EPYC 9534 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: EPYC 9534 targets Server, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

Feature	EPYC 9534	Xeon 6740P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Server	High-density Compute

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9534 launched at $8803 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($8803 vs $4650), the Xeon 6740P is $4153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9534 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Xeon 6740P the 63.4% better value option.