EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9375F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6740P

48 Cores96 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9375F

32 / 64

95,768

+5.6%

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon 6740P

48 / 96

90,684

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
❌18.5% higher power demand at 320W vs 270W.

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $656 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 320W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (90,684 vs 95,768).

EPYC 9375F

2024

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $656 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 320W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
❌18.5% higher power demand at 320W vs 270W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (90,684 vs 95,768).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Xeon 6740P?

Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 46.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the better fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6740P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9375F is 14.1% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $4,650 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6740P is also 8.0% better value on MSRP (19.5 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9375F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6740P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	315 FPS	187 FPS
medium	290 FPS	165 FPS
high	240 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	155 FPS
medium	230 FPS	131 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	70 FPS
medium	157 FPS	63 FPS
high	120 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon 6740P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	725 FPS	285 FPS
medium	618 FPS	252 FPS
high	485 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	233 FPS
medium	510 FPS	210 FPS
high	419 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	144 FPS
medium	300 FPS	133 FPS
high	270 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon 6740P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	923 FPS	849 FPS
medium	748 FPS	768 FPS
high	675 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	737 FPS
medium	584 FPS	662 FPS
high	515 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	493 FPS
medium	421 FPS	402 FPS
high	374 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon 6740P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	1141 FPS	1097 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	978 FPS
high	902 FPS	834 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	702 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	902 FPS
medium	784 FPS	777 FPS
high	688 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	656 FPS
medium	579 FPS	577 FPS
high	515 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	425 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon 6740P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Xeon 6740P

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 5.5% lead for the EPYC 9375F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+26%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+83%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	95,768+6%	90,684
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the EPYC 9375F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	High-density Compute

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($5306 vs $4650), the Xeon 6740P is $656 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Xeon 6740P the 7.7% better value option.