
EPYC 4585PX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6730P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,027 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 407.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6730P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 74,113).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,027 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 407.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6730P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (70,563 vs 74,113).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon 6730P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 980 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 395 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4585PX and Xeon 6730P

EPYC 4585PX
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon 6730P
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6730P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6730P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P — a 40% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6730P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon 6730P's 74,113 — a 4.9% lead for the Xeon 6730P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+50% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+72% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 70,563 | 74,113+5% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6730P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6730P — the Xeon 6730P supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6730P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon 6730P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 80 (Xeon 6730P) — the Xeon 6730P offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C741 (Xeon 6730P).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600 | 6400+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6730P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4585PX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon 6730P debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($699 vs $3726), the EPYC 4585PX is $3027 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6730P — making the EPYC 4585PX the 134.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-81% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+407% | 19.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













