EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P

AMD

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6521P

24 Cores48 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6521P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 64,761).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 144 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 51.8 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $1,250 MSRP).

Xeon 6521P

2025

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • +125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Costs $1,480 less on MSRP ($1,250 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
  • Delivers 120.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.8 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($1,250 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
  • 385.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6521P better than EPYC 4565P?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 4565P is ahead with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6521P pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon 6521P also has the bigger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6521P is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6521P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6521P is $1,480 cheaper on MSRP at $1,250 MSRP versus $2,730 MSRP, and it gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 4565P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 120.8% better value on MSRP (51.8 vs 23.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6521P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
1080p
low298 FPS188 FPS
medium271 FPS165 FPS
high224 FPS131 FPS
ultra188 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low273 FPS155 FPS
medium225 FPS131 FPS
high175 FPS100 FPS
ultra154 FPS82 FPS
4K
low188 FPS70 FPS
medium154 FPS63 FPS
high119 FPS49 FPS
ultra105 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
1080p
low687 FPS585 FPS
medium589 FPS517 FPS
high440 FPS428 FPS
ultra378 FPS376 FPS
1440p
low576 FPS489 FPS
medium511 FPS437 FPS
high395 FPS372 FPS
ultra314 FPS309 FPS
4K
low325 FPS304 FPS
medium292 FPS274 FPS
high257 FPS250 FPS
ultra220 FPS222 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
1080p
low891 FPS900 FPS
medium707 FPS829 FPS
high624 FPS768 FPS
ultra535 FPS677 FPS
1440p
low718 FPS770 FPS
medium570 FPS706 FPS
high492 FPS650 FPS
ultra418 FPS581 FPS
4K
low514 FPS510 FPS
medium429 FPS429 FPS
high385 FPS383 FPS
ultra321 FPS318 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
1080p
low1106 FPS983 FPS
medium991 FPS884 FPS
high867 FPS764 FPS
ultra781 FPS663 FPS
1440p
low860 FPS803 FPS
medium759 FPS699 FPS
high664 FPS601 FPS
ultra576 FPS517 FPS
4K
low632 FPS579 FPS
medium562 FPS520 FPS
high496 FPS461 FPS
ultra429 FPS396 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4565P and Xeon 6521P

AMD

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Intel

Xeon 6521P

The Xeon 6521P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,761 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6521P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon 6521P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6521P — a 32.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6521P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon 6521P's 64,761 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon 6521P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6521P.

FeatureEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+39%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+65%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
144 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm
Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
64,068
64,761+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6521P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6521P — the Xeon 6521P supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6521P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 8 (Xeon 6521P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 136 (Xeon 6521P) — the Xeon 6521P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and C741 (Xeon 6521P).

FeatureEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
Socket
AM5
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
5600
6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity
192
4096+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
136+386%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6521P). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6521P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon 6521P rivals EPYC 9354.

FeatureEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4565P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Xeon 6521P debuted at $1250. On MSRP ($2730 vs $1250), the Xeon 6521P is $1480 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 51.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6521P — making the Xeon 6521P the 75.3% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4565PXeon 6521P
MSRP
$2730
$1250-54%
Performance per Dollar
23.5
51.8+120%
Release Date
2025
2025