
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6517P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ❌84.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 190W.
Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 350W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 49,756).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 350W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ❌84.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 190W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 49,756).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than Xeon 6517P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 782 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 886 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 986 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 910 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 824 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 712 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 697 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 319 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1106 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| medium | 991 FPS | 916 FPS |
| high | 867 FPS | 782 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Xeon 6517P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P
The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6517P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 23.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX scores 49,756 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+26% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+47% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 49,756+2% | 48,810 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 20.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Xeon 6517P debuted at $1195. On MSRP ($1399 vs $1195), the Xeon 6517P is $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX delivers 35.6 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Xeon 6517P the 13.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $1195-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6 | 40.8+15% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












