
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,711 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1077.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 168mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1012.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,711 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1077.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 168mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1012.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Tesla T4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla T4

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla T4's 10,153 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 5.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1590 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 (Tesla T4) with 72 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+6% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1590 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 40+122% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 320+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T4 has 8 GB. The Tesla T4 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 0% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-1% | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+6% | 145.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91% less ($1711 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1077.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-91% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1078% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












