
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,631 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 648.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌655% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,631 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 648.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌655% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T4 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla T4

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1590 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+9% | 8.141 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+9% | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T4 has 8 GB. The Tesla T4 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 88% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 145.0+159% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 86.8% less ($1631 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 648.1% better value. The Tesla T4 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-87% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+648% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













