
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌199.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,999 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,999 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌199.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P4 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX TITAN Z make more sense than Tesla P4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 9,004+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+125% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.704 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1114 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 960 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 75W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 120.1+411% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The Tesla P4 costs 66.7% less ($1999 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 offers 210.3% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $1000-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 9.0+210% |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #300 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













