
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌0.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌0.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Black better than Tesla P4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tesla P4 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN Black?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+2% | 9,004 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 5.704 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1114 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 960 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 120.1+227% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black costs 0.1% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 2.2% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+2% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #288 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













