
Arc A550M
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A550M
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
Arc A550M
2022Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P4 better than Arc A550M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A550M make more sense than Tesla P4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A550M and Tesla P4

Arc A550M
Arc A550M
The Arc A550M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A550M scores 9,000 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A550M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Arc A550M) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Arc A550M) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000 | 9,004 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+47% | 5.704 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+84% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+219% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A550M) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Arc A550M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A550M) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Xe) (Arc A550M) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: QuickSync (Xe) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Arc A550M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync (Xe) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync (Xe) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A550M draws 60W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 22.2% difference. The Arc A550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A550M) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-20% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+25% | 120.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A550M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A550M | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1000 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GP104 |
| Release | 2022 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #279 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













