
Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1666.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1675.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 570
2017Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1666.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1675.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M60 better than Radeon RX 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 570 make more sense than Tesla M60?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 570 and Tesla M60

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 570 scores 6,967 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 570) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1244 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,967 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.095 TFLOPS+6% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1244 MHz+6% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 570) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 570 draws 120W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 570) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-60% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 58.1+149% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 570 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Radeon RX 570 costs 94.4% less ($2831 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 1691.3% better value. The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-94% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.2+1691% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #356 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












