
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1575.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 300W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1576% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 39.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌252.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 85W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1575.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 300W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1576% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 39.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌252.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 85W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M60 better than Radeon RX 470 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 470 (móvel) make more sense than Tesla M60?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 470 (móvel) and Tesla M60

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) scores 7,000 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1074 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.399 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1074 MHz | 1178 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) draws 85W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 111.7% difference. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-72% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.4+254% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) costs 94% less ($2821 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.1 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers 1600% better value. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-94% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.1+1600% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Release | August 4 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #360 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












