G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1099.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1100% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1099.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1100% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla M60 better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,000 vs 7,002 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla M60 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015 and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Tesla M60 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Tesla M60 is about 1100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $3,000 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and you are getting 0.0% higher G3D Mark. Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS make more sense than Tesla M60?

Yes. Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $250 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla M60. The trade-off is that Tesla M60 currently gives you 0.0% higher G3D Mark. Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Benchmark Check

Tesla M60 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
1080p
low	99 FPS	104 FPS
medium	86 FPS	90 FPS
high	68 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	91 FPS
medium	76 FPS	80 FPS
high	54 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	29 FPS
medium	27 FPS	27 FPS
high	18 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	16 FPS

Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Open Tesla M60

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
1080p
low	111 FPS	173 FPS
medium	77 FPS	136 FPS
high	52 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	76 FPS	125 FPS
medium	46 FPS	96 FPS
high	33 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	35 FPS	68 FPS
medium	23 FPS	52 FPS
high	18 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	32 FPS

Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Open Tesla M60

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
1080p
low	315 FPS	315 FPS
medium	252 FPS	252 FPS
high	210 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	236 FPS	236 FPS
medium	189 FPS	189 FPS
high	158 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	158 FPS
medium	126 FPS	126 FPS
high	101 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	79 FPS

Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Open Tesla M60

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
1080p
low	159 FPS	182 FPS
medium	131 FPS	148 FPS
high	115 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	116 FPS	132 FPS
medium	97 FPS	110 FPS
high	84 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	77 FPS
medium	54 FPS	60 FPS
high	44 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	36 FPS

Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Open Tesla M60

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Tesla M60

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
G3D Mark Score	7,000	7,002
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2048 ×2+33%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz+27%	1178 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The Tesla M60 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	ES 3.2	4.5+41%
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
Encoder	Adreno VPU	NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder	Adreno VPU	PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 152.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS	Tesla M60
TDP	40W-87%	300W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	175.0+651%	23.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS costs 91.7% less ($2750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers 1117.4% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).